Internet Auction Features as Quality Signals
1Shibo Li is Assistant Professor of Marketing, Kelley School of Business, Indiana University.
shili@indiana.eduKannan Srinivasan, 2
2Kannan Srinivasan is H.J. Heinz II Professor of Management, Marketing, and Information Systems, Tepper School of Business, Carnegie Mellon University.
kannans@andrew.cmu.eduBaohong Sun3
3Baohong Sun is Associate Professor of Marketing, Tepper School of Business, Carnegie Mellon University.
bsun@andrew.cmu.eduAbstract
Internet auction companies have developed innovative tools that enable sellers to reveal more information about their credibility and product quality to avoid the “lemons” problem. On the basis of signaling and auction theories, the authors propose a typology of Internet auction quality and credibility indicators, adopt and modify Park and Bradlow's (2005) model, and use eBay as an example to examine empirically how different types of indicators help alleviate uncertainty. This empirical evidence demonstrates how Internet auction features affect consumer participation and bidding decisions, what modifies the credibility of quality indicators, and how different buyers react to indicators. The signaling-based hypotheses provide coherent explanations of consumers' bidding behavior. As the first empirical study to evaluate the signaling role of comprehensive Internet auction institutional features in mitigating the adverse selection problem, this research provides evidence to clarify the economic foundation behind innovative Internet auction designs.
Cited by
Citation | PDF (247 KB) | PDF Plus (248 KB)
Online publication date: 1-Jan-2012.
CrossRef
Online publication date: 1-Dec-2011.
CrossRef
Online publication date: 1-Jul-2011.
CrossRef
Online publication date: 1-Jan-2011.
CrossRef
Online publication date: 1-Jan-2011.
CrossRef
