Conceptualizing and Measuring the Monetary Value of Brand Extensions: The Case of Motion Pictures

Thorsten Hennig-Thurau, 1

1Thorsten Hennig-Thurau is Professor of Marketing and Media Research, Bauhaus-University of Weimar, and Research Professor of Marketing, Cass Business School, London.


Mark B. Houston, 2

2Mark B. Houston is Eunice and James L. West Chair of American Enterprise and Professor of Marketing, MJ Neeley School of Business, Texas Christian University.


Torsten Heitjans3

3Torsten Heitjans is a doctoral student and a teaching and research assistant, Department of Marketing and Media Research, Bauhaus-University of Weimar.




Abstract

Brand extension value is the part of brand value that derives from a brand owner's right to introduce new products related to the brand. The authors draw on a theoretical conceptualization of brand extension success and present an approach to measure the monetary value of brand extension rights in the context of motion pictures (i.e., movie sequel rights) and to calculate the effect of variations of key extension product attributes, such as the continued participation of stars, on this value. Their measure incorporates both the forward spillover effect and the reciprocal spillover effect and accounts for differences between brand extensions and new original products in revenues and risk, thereby offering marketing scholars a novel approach for evaluating the riskiness of investment alternatives. With respect to the forward spillover effect of a parent brand on the extension product, the authors apply regression analysis to data from all 101 initial movie sequels released in North American theaters between 1998 and 2006 and to a matched subsample of original movies and calculate the risk-adjusted monetary brand extension value by comparing success predictions for both sequels and matched original movies. Regarding the reciprocal spillover effect by which the extension product affects the success of the parent brand, the authors use longitudinal data of parent-brand DVD sales to monetize the risk-adjusted impact of the brand extension on the parent. The usefulness of their approach is illustrated by calculating the monetary brand extension value for an actual movie title.

Cited by

. Can Automated Group Recommender Systems Help Consumers Make Better Choices?. Journal of Marketing 0:ja, 1-51
Citation | PDF (872 KB) | PDF Plus (873 KB) 
, . (2012) Adolescent Evaluations of Brand Extensions: The Influence of Reference Group. Psychology and Marketing 29:2, 98-106
Online publication date: 1-Feb-2012.
CrossRef
. (2012) Foreign Firms' Brand Extensions in a Host Market: Strategic Factors in International Branding Strategy. The Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice 20:1, 105-118
Online publication date: 1-Jan-2012.
CrossRef
, . (2011) Perceptions versus performance when managing extensions: new evidence about the role of fit between a parent brand and an extension. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science
Online publication date: 16-Oct-2011.
CrossRef
, , . (2011) The long-term box office performance of sequel movies. Marketing Letters
Online publication date: 10-Aug-2011.
CrossRef
, , . (2011) Consumer evaluations of brand extension: The roles of case-based reminding on brand-to-brand similarity. Psychology and Marketing 28:1, 91-113
Online publication date: 1-Jan-2011.
CrossRef
. (2009) Marketing Strategy and Wall Street: Nailing Down Marketing's Impact. Journal of Marketing 73:6, 115-118
Online publication date: 1-Nov-2009.
Citation | PDF (95 KB) | PDF Plus (104 KB)