Martijn G. de Jong1, 1Assistant Professor of Marketing, RSM Erasmus University.
MJong@rsm.nl
Jan-Benedict E.M. Steenkamp2, 2C. Knox Massey Distinguished Professor of Marketing and Marketing Area Chair, Kenan-Flagler Business School, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
JBS@unc.edu
Jean-Paul Fox3, 3Assistant professor, Department of Research Methodology, Measurement, and Data Analysis, University of Twente.
G.J.A.Fox@edte.utwente.nl
Hans Baumgartner44Professor of Marketing and Charles & Lillian Binder Faculty Fellow, Smeal College of Business, Pennsylvania State University.
jxb14@psu.edu
Abstract
Extreme response style (ERS) is an important threat to the validity of survey-based marketing research. In this article, the authors present a new item response theory–based model for measuring ERS. This model contributes to the ERS literature in two ways. First, the method improves on existing procedures by allowing different items to be differentially useful for measuring ERS and by accommodating the possibility that an item's usefulness differs across groups (e.g., countries). Second, the model integrates an advanced item response theory measurement model with a structural hierarchical model for studying antecedents of ERS. The authors simultaneously estimate a person's ERS score and individual- and group-level (country) drivers of ERS. Through simulations, they show that the new method improves on traditional procedures. They further apply the model to a large data set consisting of 12,506 consumers from 26 countries on four continents. The findings show that the model extensions are necessary to model the data adequately. Finally, they report substantive results about the effects of sociodemographic and national-cultural variables on ERS.
Cited by
Karsten Mueller,
Tammo Straatmann,
Kate Hattrup,
Marco Jochum. (2012) Effects of Personalized Versus Generic Implementation of an Intra-Organizational Online Survey on Psychological Anonymity and Response Behavior: A Field Experiment.
Journal of Business and PsychologyOnline publication date: 4-Apr-2012.
CrossRef Marietta Papadatou-Pastou,
Maryanne Martin,
Marcus R. Munafò. (2012) Measuring hand preference: A comparison among different response formats using a selected sample.
Laterality: Asymmetries of Body, Brain and Cognition1-40
Online publication date: 18-Jan-2012.
CrossRef Camelia C. Micu,
Robin Coulter. (2012) The Effect of Attractiveness in Advertising and Comparison Motives on Self-Judgments and Product Evaluations: A Cross-National Perspective.
Journal of International Consumer Marketing 24:1-2, 79-99
Online publication date: 1-Jan-2012.
CrossRef James Reardon,
Chip Miller. (2012) The effect of response scale type on cross-cultural construct measures: An empirical example using Hall's concept of context.
International Marketing Review 29:1, 24-53
Online publication date: 1-Jan-2012.
CrossRef Reto Felix. (2011) The impact of scale width on responses for multi-item, self-report measures.
Journal of Targeting, Measurement and Analysis for MarketingOnline publication date: 14-Nov-2011.
CrossRef Wen Guang Qu,
Zhiyong Yang,
Zhongming Wang. (2011) Multi-level framework of open source software adoption.
Journal of Business Research 64:9, 997-1003
Online publication date: 1-Sep-2011.
CrossRef Yuliya Strizhakova,
Robin A. Coulter,
Linda L. Price. (2011) Branding in a global marketplace: The mediating effects of quality and self-identity brand signals.
International Journal of Research in MarketingOnline publication date: 1-Sep-2011.
CrossRef Alain De Beuckelaer,
Jarl K. Kampen,
J. C. M. Van Trijp. (2011) An empirical assessment of the cross-national measurement validity of graded paired comparisons.
Quality & QuantityOnline publication date: 27-Aug-2011.
CrossRef Natalia D. Kieruj,
Guy Moors. (2011) Response style behavior: question format dependent or personal style?.
Quality & QuantityOnline publication date: 18-Aug-2011.
CrossRef Meike Morren,
John P.T.M. Gelissen,
Jeroen K. Vermunt. (2011) DEALING WITH EXTREME RESPONSE STYLE IN CROSS-CULTURAL RESEARCH: A RESTRICTED LATENT CLASS FACTOR ANALYSIS APPROACH.
Sociological Methodologyno-no
Online publication date: 1-Jun-2011.
CrossRef Bart de Langhe, Stefano Puntoni, Daniel Fernandes, Stijn M.J. van Osselaer. (2011) The Anchor Contraction Effect in International Marketing Research.
Journal of Marketing Research 48:2, 366-380
Online publication date: 1-Apr-2011.
Abstract |
PDF (2137 KB) |
PDF Plus (450 KB) Hila Riemer,
Sharon Shavitt. (2011) Impression management in survey responding: Easier for collectivists or individualists?.
Journal of Consumer Psychology 21:2, 157-168
Online publication date: 1-Apr-2011.
CrossRef Hilde Tobi,
Jarl K. Kampen. (2011) Survey error in an international context: an empirical assessment of cross-cultural differences regarding scale effects.
Quality & QuantityOnline publication date: 17-Mar-2011.
CrossRef Joseph F. Rocereto,
Marina Puzakova,
Rolph E. Anderson,
Hyokjin Kwak. 2011. The Role of Response Formats on Extreme Response Style: A Case of Likert-Type vs. Semantic Differential Scales. , 53-71.
CrossRef Meike Morren,
John Gelissen,
Jeroen Vermunt. (2011) The Impact of Controlling for Extreme Responding on Measurement Equivalence in Cross-Cultural Research.
Methodology: European Journal of Research Methods for the Behavioral and Social Sciences 1:-1, 1-12
Online publication date: 1-Jan-2011.
CrossRef Nicole Frey,
Richard George. (2010) Responsible tourism management: The missing link between business owners' attitudes and behaviour in the Cape Town tourism industry.
Tourism Management 31:5, 621-628
Online publication date: 1-Oct-2010.
CrossRef Bert Weijters,
Elke Cabooter,
Niels Schillewaert. (2010) The effect of rating scale format on response styles: The number of response categories and response category labels.
International Journal of Research in Marketing 27:3, 236-247
Online publication date: 1-Sep-2010.
CrossRef Alain De Beuckelaer,
Bert Weijters,
Anouk Rutten. (2010) Using ad hoc measures for response styles: a cautionary note.
Quality & Quantity 44:4, 761-775
Online publication date: 1-Jun-2010.
CrossRef 2010. References. , 545-594.
CrossRef Aron M. Levin,
Irwin P. Levin,
Michael P. Cook. (2010) Measuring and Accounting for Cross-Country Response Biases in Marketing Food and Drink Products.
Journal of International Consumer Marketing 22:2, 213-222
Online publication date: 19-Mar-2010.
CrossRef Joost van Rosmalen, Hester van Herk, Patrick J.F. Groenen. (2010) Identifying Response Styles: A Latent-Class Bilinear Multinomial Logit Model.
Journal of Marketing Research 47:1, 157-172
Online publication date: 1-Feb-2010.
Abstract |
PDF (291 KB) |
PDF Plus (283 KB) Martijn G. de Jong, Rik Pieters, Jean-Paul Fox. (2010) Reducing Social Desirability Bias Through Item Randomized Response: An Application to Measure Underreported Desires.
Journal of Marketing Research 47:1, 14-27
Online publication date: 1-Feb-2010.
Abstract |
PDF (168 KB) |
PDF Plus (179 KB) Ulf Böckenholt,
Sema Barlas,
Peter G. M. van der Heijden. (2009) Do randomized-response designs eliminate response biases? An empirical study of non-compliance behavior.
Journal of Applied Econometrics 24:3, 377-392
Online publication date: 1-Apr-2009.
CrossRef Yuliya Strizhakova, Robin A. Coulter, Linda L. Price. (2008) Branded Products as a Passport to Global Citizenship: Perspectives from Developed and Developing Countries.
Journal of International Marketing 16:4, 57-85
Online publication date: 1-Dec-2008.
Abstract |
PDF (173 KB) |
PDF Plus (133 KB) Y STRIZHAKOVA,
R COULTER,
L PRICE. (2008) The meanings of branded products: A cross-national scale development and meaning assessment.
International Journal of Research in Marketing 25:2, 82-93
Online publication date: 1-Jun-2008.
CrossRef