What Makes Consumers Willing to Pay a Price Premium for National Brands over Private Labels?

Jan-Benedict E.M. Steenkamp, 1

1C. Knox Massey Distinguished Professor of Marketing and Marketing Area Chair, Kenan-Flagler Business School, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.


Harald J. Van Heerde, 2

2Professor of Marketing, Waikato Management School, University of Waikato, and Extramural Fellow at CentER, Tilburg University, the Netherlands.


Inge Geyskens3

3Professor of Marketing, Tilborg School of Economics and Management, Tilburg University.




Abstract

The growing sales of private labels (PLs) pose significant challenges for national brands (NBs) around the world. A major question is whether consumers continue to be willing to pay a price premium for NBs over PLs. Using consumer survey data from 22,623 respondents from 23 countries in Asia, Europe, and the Americas across, on average, 63 consumer packaged goods categories per country, this article studies how marketing and manufacturing factors affect the price premium a consumer is willing to pay for an NB over a PL. These effects are mediated by consumer perceptions of the quality of NBs in relation to PLs. Although the results do not bode well for NBs in the sense that willingness to pay decreases as PLs mature, the authors offer several managerial recommendations to counter this trend. In countries in which PLs are more mature, the route to success is to go back to manufacturing basics. In PL development countries, there is a stronger role for marketing to enhance the willingness to pay for NBs.

Cited by

. (2012) Consumption-Based Cross-Brand Learning: Are Private Labels Really Private?. Journal of Marketing Research 49:2, 231-246
Online publication date: 1-Apr-2012.
Abstract | PDF (499 KB) | PDF Plus (512 KB) 
. (2012) When High-Similarity Copycats Lose and Moderate-Similarity Copycats Gain: The Impact of Comparative Evaluation. Journal of Marketing Research 49:1, 83-91
Online publication date: 1-Feb-2012.
Abstract | PDF (211 KB) | PDF Plus (223 KB) 
, . (2012) Value-for-money perceptions of supermarket and private labels. Australasian Marketing Journal (AMJ)
Online publication date: 1-Feb-2012.
CrossRef
. (2012) “Outing” the supplier: implications for manufacturers and retailers. Journal of Product & Brand Management 21:1, 47-52
Online publication date: 1-Jan-2012.
CrossRef
. New Products: The Antidote to Private Label Growth?. Journal of Marketing Research 0:0, 1-16
Abstract | PDF (357 KB) | PDF Plus (377 KB) 
, . (2011) Two-Tier Store Brands: The Benefic Impact of a Value Brand on Perceptions of a Premium Brand. Journal of Retailing
Online publication date: 1-Oct-2011.
CrossRef
, , . (2011) Understanding Money-Back Guarantees: Cognitive, Affective, and Behavioral Outcomes. Journal of Retailing
Online publication date: 1-Oct-2011.
CrossRef
, . (2011) The nature and incidence of private label rejection. Australasian Marketing Journal (AMJ) 19:2, 93-99
Online publication date: 1-May-2011.
CrossRef
. (2011) Supplier inferences to enhance private label perceptions. Journal of Business Research
Online publication date: 12-Mar-2011.
CrossRef
, , , . (2011) Assessing quality perception of private labels: intransient cues and consumer characteristics. Journal of Consumer Marketing 28:6, 448-458
Online publication date: 1-Jan-2011.
CrossRef