Risk, Trade, Recovery, and the Consideration of Real Options: The Imperative Coordination of Policy, Marketing, and Finance in the Wake of Catastrophe

Mark R. Manfredo 1,

1Associate professor, Morrison School of Management and Agribusiness, Arizona State University.


Clifford J. Shultz II 2

2Professor and Marley Foundation Chair, Morrison School of Management and Agribusiness, Arizona State University.




Abstract

Recovery from societal and market catastrophe is a daunting process that requires multifunctional, systemic, and long-term efforts. Humanitarian aid and donor assistance are rarely sufficient. Trade and other forms of direct investment in devastated markets offer another kind of recovery assistance. However, risks encountered in recovering economies can deter firms from investing. The authors apply a real-options framework to examine the financial feasibility of trading with recovering economies; they apply the framework to the countries of the war-disintegrated former Yugoslavia. The real-options framework considers the value of managerial flexibility in the presence of risks. The authors discuss implications for policy, marketing management, export development, and economic and societal recovery in several contexts.

Cited by

, . (2010) Lebanon: From cataclysm to opportunity—Crisis management lessons for MNCs in the tourism sector of the Middle East. Journal of World Business
Online publication date: 1-Nov-2010.
CrossRef
. (2009) Vulnerability and Resilience in Natural Disasters: A Marketing and Public Policy Perspective. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing 28:1, 114-123
Online publication date: 1-May-2009.
Abstract | PDF (75 KB) | PDF Plus (88 KB) 
. (2009) Caught in the middle: multinational enterprise strategy in interstate warfare. Competitiveness Review: An International Business Journal incorporating Journal of Global Competitiveness 19:5, 355-376
Online publication date: 1-Jan-2009.
CrossRef